CITIBANK NEVADA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
CIK 839948Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davenport Evans Hurwitz & SmithFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.23×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Davenport Evans Hurwitz & Smith | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.23 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Arthur Cox | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David MercadoCravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 2.12 |