WILLAMETTE VALLEY VINEYARDS INC WVVI (last ticker on record)
CIK 838875Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew BondSangra Moller LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Andrew J. BondSheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.56× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.58× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Marcus J. WilliamsDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew BondSangra Moller LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Andrew J. BondSheppard Mullin | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 1.99 |
| David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 0.89 |
| Marcus J. WilliamsDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.56 | 1.77 | 1.05 |