IDEANOMICS, INC. IDEX (last ticker on record)
CIK 837852Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2021 to Nov 2024
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Lewis and RocaFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2019 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Venable LLP | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Reed Smith | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Lewis and Roca | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.33 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Hodgson Russ | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2019 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arif SotoVenable LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 8.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Thomas M. ShoesmithPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 2.68× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Brian J. BuckPillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Louis A. BevilacquaBevilacqua PLLCFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.97× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law FirmFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arif SotoVenable LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 12 | 8.18 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.36 |
| Thomas M. ShoesmithPillsbury Winthrop | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.08 | 2.68 | 1.41 |
| Brian J. BuckPillsbury Winthrop | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Louis A. BevilacquaBevilacqua PLLC | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 103 | 0.92 | 1.97 | 1.30 |
| Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law Firm | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 20 | 2.75 | 2.05 | 1.01 |