MTR GAMING GROUP INC MNTG (last ticker on record)
CIK 834162Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- RUBEN & ARONSONFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- ROSS & HARDIESFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 3.15× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stevens & Lee | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| RUBEN & ARONSON | Aug 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ROSS & HARDIES | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.81 | 3.15 | 1.60 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David W. SwartzStevens & LeeFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Deborah J. RuoschMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Edward A. FriedmanRUBEN & ARONSONFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- DAVID S. GUINROSS & HARDIESFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Kevin T. CollinsJenner & BlockFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David W. SwartzStevens & Lee | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Deborah J. RuoschMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Edward A. FriedmanRUBEN & ARONSON | Sep 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| DAVID S. GUINROSS & HARDIES | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.45 | 1.59 | 1.42 |
| Kevin T. CollinsJenner & Block | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.97 | 1.60 | 0.82 |