Boots & Coots, Inc. WEL (last ticker on record)
CIK 833845Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Holland & Hart | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Thompson & Knight | Apr 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew M. BakerBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William T. Heller IVThompson & KnightFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- John L. PetersenFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.81× · Went dark 2.44× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew M. BakerBaker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William T. Heller IVThompson & Knight | Apr 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| John L. Petersen | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.81 | 2.44 | 0.00 |