FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC FCX (last ticker on record)

CIK 831259Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring
SEC/DOJ scrutiny

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Feb 2025
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Feb 14, 2025A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 8, 2004Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 14, 2003A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Akin Gump	Mar 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	582	1.24	0.52	1.25
Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell	Mar 2013	Named in a filing	256	1.51	0.21	0.89
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Dec 2012	Named in a filing	889	1.31	0.07	0.59
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Dec 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	1,051	1.31	0.27	0.91
Jones Walker	Mar 1997	Named in SEC correspondence	161	1.34	0.23	0.94
Davis Polk	Apr 1994	Named in SEC correspondence	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Shearman & Sterling	Aug 2013	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Bracewell LLP	Apr 2013	Text search only	247	0.93	0.31	1.03
Fried Frank	Nov 2001	Text search only	540	1.33	0.24	0.94
Maples and Calder	Nov 2001	Text search only	1,144	0.95	0.26	0.92

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Alexandra C. LayfieldJones Walker	Aug 2021	Named in a filing	7	2.35	0.00	0.00
Kelly C. SimoneauxJones Walker	Jun 2013	Named in a filing	20	1.32	0.00	0.37
David A. HarrisMorris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell	Mar 2013	Named in a filing	8	1.29	0.00	1.03
Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Mar 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	107	1.23	0.00	0.75
David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Dec 2012	Named in a filing	56	0.95	0.00	0.54
Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk	Mar 2007	Named in a filing	149	0.91	0.00	1.06
Marc O. WilliamsDavis Polk	Dec 2006	Named in a filing	26	1.70	0.00	0.38
Paul R. KingsleyJones Walker	Dec 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	7	1.49	0.00	0.00
Margaret F. MurphyJones Walker	Aug 1999	Named in a filing	32	1.87	0.00	1.65
William B. MastersJones Walker	Mar 1997	Named in a filing	10	3.59	0.71	2.78
David W. Ferguson	Mar 1994	Named in SEC correspondence	18	1.49	1.03	1.10
Thomas W. AdkinsBracewell LLP	Apr 2013	Text search only	12	1.60	0.00	1.64
Jenna E. LevineWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Dec 2012	Text search only	35	1.09	0.00	0.33