MULTI FINELINE ELECTRONIX INC MFLX (last ticker on record)
CIK 830916Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- White & CaseFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Drew & NapierFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White & Case | Jul 2016 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Allen & Gledhill | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Drew & Napier | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 17 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Bryan Cave | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David EislerDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Jeffrey T. BaglioDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Jay de GrootMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Christopher M. ForresterShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Stanton D. WongPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David EislerDLA Piper | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Jeffrey T. BaglioDLA Piper | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Jay de GrootMorrison & Foerster | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Christopher M. ForresterShearman & Sterling | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Stanton D. WongPillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.59 |