OREGON STEEL MILLS INC OS (last ticker on record)
CIK 830260Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- May 1998 to Dec 2000
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Schwabe Williamson & WyattFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 2.72×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Dufford & Brown, P.C.First linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.29 | 2.10 | 2.72 |
| Stoel Rives | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Dufford & Brown, P.C. | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 16 | 1.23 | 0.65 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John R. ThomasPerkins CoieFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Robert J. MoormanStoel RivesFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Steven H. HullStoel RivesFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 3.83× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John R. ThomasPerkins Coie | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Robert J. MoormanStoel Rives | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Steven H. HullStoel Rives | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 11 | 0.97 | 3.83 | 1.38 |