Inuvo, Inc. INUV (last ticker on record)

CIK 829323Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
95% wipeout

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Jul 2019
Largest fall in its shares: 98%; Dec 2010 to Aug 2026
Law firms: 12; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 5; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jul 12, 2019Shares down 95% from their high
Jun 2, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 22, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 4, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 21, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 4, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 13, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 23, 2010Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 31, 2009A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 31, 2009A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 31, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 22, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Oct 28, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
McDonald Carano	May 2021	Named in a filing	59	1.33	1.06	1.26
Troutman Sanders LLP	Apr 2019	Named in a filing	335	1.15	0.61	1.16
Pearlman Law Group	Sep 2017	Named in a filing	24	0.00	0.00	1.40
Pearlman Schneider LLP	Mar 2014	Named in a filing	32	1.34	1.79	1.41
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP	Nov 2011	Named in a filing	67	0.63	0.54	1.07
Schneider Weinberger LLP	Sep 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	77	1.59	2.20	1.44
SHEFSKY & FROELICH	Sep 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	9	1.74	2.29	0.68
Clark Hill	Feb 2021	Text search only	51	1.57	0.00	0.70
Pillsbury Winthrop	Sep 2017	Text search only	516	1.13	0.82	1.27
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Nov 2011	Text search only	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Roxanne K. Beilly	Mar 2011	Text search only	44	1.21	2.14	1.45
Steven I. Weinberger	Mar 2011	Text search only	49	1.10	1.85	1.51

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Brian A. PearlmanPearlman Law Group	Sep 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	29	0.67	1.57	1.13
Jeremy D. SiegfriedPorter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP	Nov 2011	Named in a filing	11	0.96	0.00	0.97
James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLP	Mar 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	69	1.69	2.51	1.47
Mitchell D. GoldsmithTaft Stettinius & Hollister	Sep 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	13	2.31	1.42	0.56
Steven I. WeinbergerSchneider Weinberger LLP	Mar 2011	Text search only	47	1.33	1.75	1.32