GSI COMMERCE INC GSIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 828750Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Cooley LLP | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Blank Rome | Apr 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard B. AldridgeMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Brett D. WhiteCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Thomas S. WelkCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank RomeFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- David A. LipkinCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Francis E. DehelBlank RomeFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 2.54× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard B. AldridgeMorgan Lewis | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Brett D. WhiteCooley LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| Thomas S. WelkCooley LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank Rome | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 29 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| David A. LipkinCooley LLP | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Francis E. DehelBlank Rome | Apr 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.15 | 2.54 | 0.42 |