ZILA INC ZILA (last ticker on record)
CIK 827156Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2004 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Streich LangFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Quarles & Brady | Feb 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Streich Lang | Feb 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 2.02 | 1.15 | 1.04 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael M. DonaheySnell & WilmerFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- Christian J. Hoffmann IIIQuarles & BradyFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 2.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael M. DonaheySnell & Wilmer | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| Christian J. Hoffmann IIIQuarles & Brady | Feb 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.34 | 2.00 | 0.81 |