MTS MEDICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC MTSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 823560Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan & Hartson | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 70 | 0.49 | 1.01 | 1.37 |
| Holland & Knight | Mar 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- George A. HagertyHogan & HartsonFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Darrell C. SmithShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Robert J. GrammigHolland & KnightFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked Mar 1996 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George A. HagertyHogan & Hartson | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Darrell C. SmithShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Robert J. GrammigHolland & Knight | Mar 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns | Mar 1996 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.23 | 1.59 | 0.97 |