EOM Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. IMUC (last ticker on record)
CIK 822411Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2012 to Jun 2019
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Louis A. BrillemanFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louis A. Brilleman | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.83 | 1.43 | 1.15 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| TroyGould PC | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
| Reed Smith | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard MullinFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Louis A. BrillemanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Carlton FlemingCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Glen Y. SatoCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Dale E. ShortTroyGould PCFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Sanford J. HillsbergTroyGould PCFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Marc L. BrownTroyGould PCFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Kenneth G. SamDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
| Louis A. BrillemanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.77 | 1.54 | 1.21 |
| Carlton FlemingCooley LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| Glen Y. SatoCooley LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.66 |
| Dale E. ShortTroyGould PC | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.52 | 1.42 | 1.26 |
| Sanford J. HillsbergTroyGould PC | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.87 | 1.13 | 1.59 |
| Marc L. BrownTroyGould PC | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Kenneth G. SamDorsey & Whitney LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 45 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 1.27 |