IDM PHARMA, INC. IDMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 822206Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Luce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 80 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.90 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Barbara L. BordenCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- L. Kay ChandlerCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Frederick T. MutoCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 51 | 1.24 | 0.33 | 1.01 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Barbara L. BordenCooley LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| L. Kay ChandlerCooley LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Frederick T. MutoCooley LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.13 |