BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS INC BNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 821616Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willkie Farr | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Palmer & Dodge | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey S. HochmanWillkie FarrFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Matthew J. BensonEdwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Nathaniel S. GardinerPalmer & DodgeFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Gary J. SimonHughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey S. HochmanWillkie Farr | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Matthew J. BensonEdwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Nathaniel S. GardinerPalmer & Dodge | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Gary J. SimonHughes Hubbard & Reed | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.14 |