DISPLAYTECH INC
CIK 821256Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Moye White LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre & Benson | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Moye White LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 18 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James H. CarrollFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & BensonFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Michael M. McGawnFaegre & BensonFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- Steven R. ShoemateGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James H. Carroll | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.37 | 1.42 | 1.84 |
| Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & Benson | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.79 | 1.61 | 1.21 |
| Michael M. McGawnFaegre & Benson | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 2.28 |
| Steven R. ShoemateGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.89 |