PLACER DOME INC
CIK 819996Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLPFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 0.92 |
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert E. SpattSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Christopher C. PaciDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Richard HallCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Ellen PattersonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert E. SpattSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Christopher C. PaciDLA Piper | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Richard HallCravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 47 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Ellen PattersonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |