RAINBOW TECHNOLOGIES INC RNBO (last ticker on record)
CIK 819706Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Venable LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & SmithFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.53× · Went dark 3.50× · 95% wipeout 4.44×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- MOSKOWITZ ALTMAN & HUGHES LLPFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venable LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 9 | 3.53 | 3.50 | 4.44 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
| MOSKOWITZ ALTMAN & HUGHES LLP | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elizabeth R. HughesVenable LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Steve L. CamahortShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- ROBERT L. KOHLKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.00×
- Stanley MoskowitzFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth R. HughesVenable LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.13 | 0.81 | 1.26 |
| Steve L. CamahortShearman & Sterling | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| ROBERT L. KOHLKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| Stanley Moskowitz | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.11 |