TOASTMASTER INC
CIK 818268Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Stinson, Mag & Fizzell, P.C.First linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2019 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Barley SnyderFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Cades SchutteFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Miles & StockbridgeFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Stinson, Mag & Fizzell, P.C. | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.89 | 1.02 | 0.67 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2019 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Barley Snyder | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 28 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Quarles & Brady | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Cades Schutte | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 21 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Miles & Stockbridge | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 71 | 1.19 | 0.73 | 0.46 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Thompson Coburn | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Evan J. CappelliPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Paul BerkowitzGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.53× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Robert C. GoldsteinPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evan J. CappelliPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 72 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 54 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Paul BerkowitzGreenberg Traurig | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 21 | 2.53 | 0.70 | 0.35 |
| Robert C. GoldsteinPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 6 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |