HERON THERAPEUTICS, INC. HRTX (last ticker on record)
CIK 818033Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2018 to Aug 2026
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPFirst linked Sep 2025 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Sep 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| K&L Gates | Aug 2024 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Heller Ehrman | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| McDermott Will & Schulte LLP | Sep 2025 | Text search only | 22 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Emilio RagosaMorgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Justin A. KisnerCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Matthew T. BrowneCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Reid S. HooperCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Kyle GuseHeller EhrmanFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Marina RemennikCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Julian N. SternHeller EhrmanFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Richard A. PeersHeller EhrmanFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Sep 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| Emilio RagosaMorgan Lewis | Sep 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Justin A. KisnerCooley LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Matthew T. BrowneCooley LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Reid S. HooperCooley LLP | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.66 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Kyle GuseHeller Ehrman | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Marina RemennikCooley LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.47 | 2.49 | 1.03 |
| Julian N. SternHeller Ehrman | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Richard A. PeersHeller Ehrman | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 2.24 |