QUEEN CITY BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK INC
CIK 818012Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Bond Schoeneck & KingFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Farella Braun & MartelFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Husch & EppenbergerFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Bond Schoeneck & King | May 2004 | Text search only | 29 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Farella Braun & Martel | May 2004 | Text search only | 23 | 0.40 | 1.33 | 1.07 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Husch & Eppenberger | May 2004 | Text search only | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| Paul Hastings | May 2004 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Russell W. Parks Jr.Akin GumpFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.40×
- Stephen E. OlderMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.92× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell W. Parks Jr.Akin Gump | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 3.40 |
| Stephen E. OlderMcGuireWoods LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 35 | 2.92 | 0.66 | 1.79 |