ALARIS MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC AMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 817161Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- WEITZEN SHALOV & WEINFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.98 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.80 |
| WEITZEN SHALOV & WEIN | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lance Jon KimmelSEC Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- GORDON ALTMAN BUTOWSKYWEITZEN SHALOV & WEINFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lance Jon KimmelSEC Law Firm | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 1.75 |
| Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA Piper | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| GORDON ALTMAN BUTOWSKYWEITZEN SHALOV & WEIN | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |