Alliance HealthCare Services, Inc AIQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 817135Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Nov 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jun 2002 to Jul 2012
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- O'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2008 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| O'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 1.70 |
| Irell & Manella | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2008 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Joshua M. DubofskyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.17×
- Keith BensonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- James P. BeaubienLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Anthony T. IlerIrell & ManellaFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- Nicholas S. O KeefeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.80× · Went dark 2.75× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Peter F. KermanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| Joshua M. DubofskyLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Keith BensonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| James P. BeaubienLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Anthony T. IlerIrell & Manella | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.26 | 2.41 | 2.30 |
| Nicholas S. O KeefeLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 3.80 | 2.75 | 1.64 |
| Peter F. KermanLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 16 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.70 |