CONMED Corp CNMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 816956Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Melissa SawyerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Robert W. DownesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- ROBERT B. HIDEN JR.Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa SawyerSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Robert W. DownesSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.62 | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| ROBERT B. HIDEN JR.Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |