BIOPURE CORP BPUR (last ticker on record)
CIK 815508Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2000 to Dec 2009
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Jones DayFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Hogan & Hartson | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Jones Day | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Matthew M. RicciardiLeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- J. Eric MakiSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchen | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.78 | 2.41 | 0.76 |
| Matthew M. RicciardiLeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| J. Eric MakiSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.82 |