ABIOMED INC ABMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 815094Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Foley Hoag | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Brown Rudnick | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew G. HurdSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert W. DownesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Peter W. CooganFoley HoagFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter M. RosenblumFoley HoagFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Philip J. FlinkBrown RudnickFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew G. HurdSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert W. DownesSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.62 | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| Peter W. CooganFoley Hoag | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter M. RosenblumFoley Hoag | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.30 | 1.38 | 0.72 |
| Philip J. FlinkBrown Rudnick | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |