HILB ROGAL & HOBBS CO HRH (last ticker on record)
CIK 814898Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Williams MullenFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Mullen | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 113 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William L. PitmanSmith Moore LeatherwoodFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.82×
- John M. BrandowWilliams MullenFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- John M. Oakey IIIWilliams MullenFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Robert E. Spicer Jr.Williams MullenFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William L. PitmanSmith Moore Leatherwood | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 3.82 |
| John M. BrandowWilliams Mullen | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| John M. Oakey IIIWilliams Mullen | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Robert E. Spicer Jr.Williams Mullen | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 2.08 |