MBIA INC MBI (last ticker on record)
CIK 814585Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Dec 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Dec 2006 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Day Pitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Day Berry & HowardFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day Pitney LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Day Berry & Howard | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 61 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven J. SlutzkyDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Nicholas F. PotterDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- ANDREW L. SOMMERDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven J. SlutzkyDebevoise & Plimpton | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Nicholas F. PotterDebevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| ANDREW L. SOMMERDebevoise & Plimpton | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 1.27 |