FAIR ISAAC CORP FICO (last ticker on record)
CIK 814547Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 138 | 1.29 | 4.29 | 1.16 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Faegre & Benson | Dec 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.16 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kathleen D. RothmanFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Sonia A. ShewchukFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- DAVID R. LAMARREPillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 2.13× · 95% wipeout 3.30×
- Blair W. WhitePillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Kathleen D. Rothman | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Sonia A. ShewchukFaegre Baker Daniels | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DAVID R. LAMARREPillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.01 | 2.13 | 3.30 |
| Blair W. WhitePillsbury Winthrop | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.05 |