NEWELL BRANDS INC. NWL (last ticker on record)
CIK 814453Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kane Kessler, P.C.First linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Jones Day | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Schiff Hardin | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Kane Kessler, P.C. | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 58 | 1.27 | 1.59 | 0.98 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Clifford E. NeimethGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Joel T. MayBlake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Lizanne ThomasJones DayFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert A. ProfusekJones DayFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Robert J. MinkusSchiff HardinFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 3.41× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- David McCarthySchiff HardinFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Frederick L. HartmannSchiff HardinFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- STUART L. GOODMANSchiff HardinFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- LINDA J. WIGHTSchiff HardinFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.61 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| Clifford E. NeimethGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Joel T. MayBlake Cassels & Graydon | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Lizanne ThomasJones Day | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert A. ProfusekJones Day | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Robert J. MinkusSchiff Hardin | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.53 | 3.41 | 0.95 |
| David McCarthySchiff Hardin | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Frederick L. HartmannSchiff Hardin | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| STUART L. GOODMANSchiff Hardin | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| LINDA J. WIGHTSchiff Hardin | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 2.44 |
| Mario A. PonceSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 23 | 2.60 | 1.10 | 1.22 |