QUAKER STATE CORP
CIK 81381Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.12 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Reed Smith | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey A. ChapmanGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- DEREK R. MCCLAINVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Ann Bailen FisherSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey A. ChapmanGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DEREK R. MCCLAINVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Ann Bailen FisherSullivan & Cromwell | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 1.92 |