DESTINATION XL GROUP, INC. DXLG (last ticker on record)
CIK 813298Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Oct 2013 to Dec 2020
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian H. BlaneyGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Katherine A. BeckGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Elizabeth W. FraserGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.69× · Went dark 7.58× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Bradley A. JacobsonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Peter G. SmithKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian H. BlaneyGreenberg Traurig | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.32 |
| Katherine A. BeckGreenberg Traurig | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Elizabeth W. FraserGreenberg Traurig | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.69 | 7.58 | 1.38 |
| Bradley A. JacobsonGreenberg Traurig | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Peter G. SmithKramer Levin Naftalis | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.25 |