WELLMAN INC WLM (last ticker on record)
CIK 812708Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2005 to Apr 2008
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duane Morris | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Edwards & Angell | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Palmer & Dodge | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- D. Roger GlennGlenn & GlennFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 2.85× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Daniel DunsonSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Christine M. MarxEdwards & AngellFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Roger GlennGlenn & Glenn | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.75 | 2.85 | 1.30 |
| Daniel DunsonSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| Christine M. MarxEdwards & Angell | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.79 |