UNO RESTAURANT CORP UNO (last ticker on record)
CIK 812075Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Lewis and RocaFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown Rudnick | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Lewis and Roca | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 46 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.33 |
| Proskauer Rose | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James E. DawsonNutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 3.27× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- CONSTANTINE ALEXANDERNutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James E. DawsonNutter McClennen & Fish | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 7 | 1.94 | 3.27 | 0.66 |
| CONSTANTINE ALEXANDERNutter McClennen & Fish | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 7 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.84 |