Santander Holdings USA, Inc. SOV-PC (last ticker on record)

CIK 811830Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restatement
SEC/DOJ scrutiny

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Nov 2024
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Nov 6, 2024A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Mar 3, 2022Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 13, 2018A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Sep 23, 2016Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 30, 2009Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 21, 2006Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Lucosky Brookman LLP	Jun 2026	Named in a filing	223	1.24	2.05	1.19
Cravath Swaine & Moore	Feb 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	839	1.29	0.03	0.85
McGuireWoods LLP	Mar 2011	Named in a filing	358	0.97	0.85	1.11
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Mar 2011	Named in a filing	889	1.31	0.07	0.59
Goodwin Procter	Apr 2004	Named in a filing	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Rhoads & Sinon LLP	Oct 2001	Named in a filing	23	1.00	0.00	0.00
Blank Rome	Apr 1998	Named in a filing	348	1.04	0.79	1.36
Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P.	Dec 1997	Named in a filing	147	0.62	0.38	0.43
Luse Gorman, PC	Jan 1997	Named in a filing	301	0.58	0.06	0.21
Stevens & Lee	Dec 1995	Named in SEC correspondence	127	1.08	0.74	0.59
Shearman & Sterling	Dec 2005	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Satterlee Stephens LLP	Nov 2003	Text search only	35	1.33	0.36	1.31
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.	Oct 2001	Text search only	995	1.46	0.37	0.80

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	95% wipeout
Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Dec 2017	Named in a filing	26	1.80	0.78
Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	May 2016	Named in a filing	14	1.12	0.98
Joel F. HeroldCravath Swaine & Moore	Feb 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	8	3.00	1.21
Nicholas G. DemmoWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Sep 2012	Named in a filing	62	1.60	0.85
Lawrence S. MakowWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Mar 2011	Named in a filing	45	1.74	0.92
Jeffrey P. WaldronStevens & Lee	Jun 2007	Named in a filing	20	1.91	0.00
Wesley R. KelsoStevens & Lee	Jun 2004	Named in a filing	16	1.11	0.00
David W. SwartzStevens & Lee	Oct 2001	Named in a filing	15	0.61	0.61
James A. MatareseGoodwin Procter	Apr 2004	Text search only	26	0.78	0.00
William P. MayerGoodwin Procter	Apr 2004	Text search only	16	0.47	0.00
Carol Hempfling PrattFoley Hoag	Sep 2003	Text search only	8	0.84	0.00
Peter W. CooganFoley Hoag	Sep 2003	Text search only	6	2.44	0.00
Charles J. FerryRhoads & Sinon LLP	Oct 2001	Text search only	10	0.93	0.00