STERLING FINANCIAL CORP SFLI (last ticker on record)
CIK 811671Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C.First linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.79 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C. | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- B. Tyler LincolnSHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C.First linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Nicholas Bybel Jr.SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C.First linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Gary R. BronsteinKilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joel E. RappoportKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- John B. LampiSchifino & Fleischer, P.A.First linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Tyler LincolnSHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C. | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Nicholas Bybel Jr.SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C. | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Gary R. BronsteinKilpatrick Townsend | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joel E. RappoportKilpatrick Stockton | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 21 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| John B. LampiSchifino & Fleischer, P.A. | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |