UST INC UST (last ticker on record)
CIK 811669Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- VINCENT J. PISANOSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- David J. FriedmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 1.88× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 73 | 1.60 | 0.31 | 0.58 |
| VINCENT J. PISANOSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.35 | 0.90 | 1.34 |
| David J. FriedmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.88 | 1.88 | 0.00 |