CEDAR FAIR L P FUN (last ticker on record)
CIK 811532Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- McInnes CooperFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Warner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| McInnes Cooper | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.14 | 0.48 | 1.14 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Warner Norcross & Judd | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Patton Boggs | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bruce C. YoungWarner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Jeffrey J. MarguliesSquire Sanders (US)First linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce C. YoungWarner Norcross & Judd | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Jeffrey J. MarguliesSquire Sanders (US) | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |