ENTECH SOLAR, INC. ENSL (last ticker on record)
CIK 811271Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Luce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Hallett & Perrin, P.C.First linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bingham McCutchen | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 80 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.90 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Hallett & Perrin, P.C. | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 27 | 1.70 | 2.06 | 1.25 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Laurie A. CervenyMorgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law FirmFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Robert Steven BrownReitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLCFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 1.52× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurie A. CervenyMorgan Lewis | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.32 | 1.30 | 0.53 |
| Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law Firm | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 20 | 2.75 | 2.05 | 1.01 |
| Robert Steven BrownReitler Brown & Rosenblatt LLC | May 2004 | Text search only | 19 | 0.51 | 1.52 | 0.50 |