BIOLASE, INC BIOL (last ticker on record)
CIK 811240Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Oct 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 100%
- Jan 2004 to Jul 2025
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 23
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- KELLY LYTTON MINTZ & VANN LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.90× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 5.87×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jun 2020 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2019 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Sep 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| KELLY LYTTON MINTZ & VANN LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.90 | 1.33 | 5.87 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Holland & Knight | Jun 2020 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2019 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Paul Hastings | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Shaw Pittman | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank RomeFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Aaron M. SchleicherSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in a filing · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Beth E. BergSidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Beth E. PeevSidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.26×
- Lindsey A. SmithSidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Beth E. FlamingSidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- Michael A. GordonSidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- William J. CerniusLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Christopher M. ForresterShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Albert P. AsatoorianPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Ethan D. FefferSheppard MullinFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- Ellen S. BancroftDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Parker A. SchweichDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.42×
- Cathryn S. GawneSilicon Valley Law GroupFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 2.53×
- Istvan HajduSidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- John F. Della GrottaPaul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 2.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank Rome | Jul 2023 | Named in a filing | 29 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | May 2023 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Aaron M. SchleicherSullivan & Worcester LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.88 | 1.89 | 1.25 |
| Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.94 | 1.45 | 1.52 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in a filing | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Beth E. BergSidley Austin | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Beth E. PeevSidley Austin | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.26 |
| Lindsey A. SmithSidley Austin | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Beth E. FlamingSidley Austin | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.30 |
| Michael A. GordonSidley Austin | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| William J. CerniusLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Christopher M. ForresterShearman & Sterling | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Albert P. AsatoorianPillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Ethan D. FefferSheppard Mullin | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 2.18 |
| Ellen S. BancroftDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.55 | 0.61 | 1.44 |
| Parker A. SchweichDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 2.42 |
| Cathryn S. GawneSilicon Valley Law Group | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.61 | 1.72 | 2.53 |
| Istvan HajduSidley Austin | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2020 | Text search only | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.66 |
| John F. Della GrottaPaul Hastings | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 1.47 | 1.93 | 2.99 |