GLOBALNET CORP GLBT (last ticker on record)
CIK 810932Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- The Baum Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.69 | 0.84 | 1.16 |
| The Baum Law Firm | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 22 | 2.77 | 1.72 | 0.32 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Ballard Spahr | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James G. SmithTarter Krinsky & Drogin LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. FlemingFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Gerald J. GuarciniBallard SpahrFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James G. SmithTarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.73 | 1.18 | 1.37 |
| Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. Fleming | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 84 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.06 |
| Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law Firm | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 20 | 2.75 | 2.05 | 1.01 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Gerald J. GuarciniBallard Spahr | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 69 | 1.48 | 1.67 | 0.40 |