NAVIDEA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC. NAVB (last ticker on record)
CIK 810509Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2012 to May 2024
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Moomjian Waite & ColemanFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.34× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Dickinson WrightFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Benesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson Hine LLP | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Moomjian Waite & Coleman | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 5.34 | 0.75 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Dickinson Wright | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 1.07 |
| Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 154 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Matthew BernsteinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Martin R. RosenbaumMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jennifer A. ValThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. LeinwandFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- William M. MowerMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Robert P. BellFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- William J. Kelly Jr.Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Matthew BernsteinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Sarah E. WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.72 | 1.81 | 1.02 |
| Martin R. RosenbaumMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Jennifer A. ValThompson Hine LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | — | 0.53 |
| Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. Leinwand | Dec 2019 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.19 | 1.82 | 1.17 |
| Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLP | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| William M. MowerMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.52 | 0.75 | 1.61 |
| Robert P. Bell | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.13 |
| William J. Kelly Jr.Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.66 |