CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. TAST (last ticker on record)
CIK 809248Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & SteinerFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Baer Marks & UphamFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Mar 2024 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Akerman LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2024 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Pryor Cashman | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 25 | 2.09 | 0.57 | 1.47 |
| Akin Gump | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Baer Marks & Upham | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 27 | 0.89 | 1.31 | 1.23 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Derek WinokurMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Evan L. GreebelKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Wayne A. WaldAkerman LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- KEITH WASSERSTROMBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 4.32× · 95% wipeout 3.01×
- Kim E. RamseyAkin GumpFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek WinokurMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Mar 2024 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Evan L. GreebelKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.68 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Wayne A. WaldAkerman LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.83 | 1.45 | 0.62 |
| KEITH WASSERSTROMBaker & McKenzie | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 1.44 | 4.32 | 3.01 |
| Kim E. RamseyAkin Gump | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 5 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |