C&D TECHNOLOGIES INC CHP (last ticker on record)
CIK 808064Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2003 to Oct 2010
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ettore A. SantucciFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Willkie Farr | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Duane Morris | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Proskauer Rose | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Ettore A. Santucci | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Sean RodgersSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John W. KauffmanDuane MorrisFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 2.15×
- Paul M. HarringtonFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Thomas G. SpencerDuane MorrisFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie Farr | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Sean RodgersSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John W. KauffmanDuane Morris | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.15 |
| Paul M. Harrington | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer Rose | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin Procter | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 20 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Thomas G. SpencerDuane Morris | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |