CASH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL INC CSH (last ticker on record)
CIK 807884Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Bingham Greenebaum DollFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Crowe & Dunlevy A Professional CorporationFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Hunton & Williams | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.15 |
| Ballard Spahr | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Bingham Greenebaum Doll | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 20 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Bryan Cave | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Crowe & Dunlevy A Professional Corporation | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 31 | 1.42 | 0.42 | 1.41 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| K&L Gates | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- L. Steven LeshinHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- Gregory J. SchmittHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Roger A. StongCrowe & Dunlevy A Professional CorporationFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.34× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L. Steven LeshinHunton & Williams | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.97 |
| Gregory J. SchmittHunton & Williams | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Roger A. StongCrowe & Dunlevy A Professional Corporation | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 15 | 2.34 | 0.93 | 1.37 |