ARCHSTONE ASN (last ticker on record)
CIK 80737Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Munger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Ballard Spahr | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Munger Tolles & Olson | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 80 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| King & Spalding | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Mayer Brown | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David P. SlotkinMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bruce W. GilchristHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael L. HermsenMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward J. SchneidmanMayer BrownFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David P. SlotkinMorrison & Foerster | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| J. Warren Gorrell Jr.Hogan & Hartson | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bruce W. GilchristHogan & Hartson | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael L. HermsenMayer Brown | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward J. SchneidmanMayer Brown | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.56 |