SIZELER PROPERTY INVESTORS INC SIZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 805419Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Jaeckle Fleischmann & Mugel, LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Jaeckle Fleischmann & Mugel, LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Piper Rudnick | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Hunton & Williams | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason C. HarmonDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Michael J. SteinDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Robert W. Smith Jr.DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason C. HarmonDLA Piper | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Michael J. SteinDLA Piper | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Robert W. Smith Jr.DLA Piper | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |