TECHTEAM GLOBAL INC TEAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 805054Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- BERRY MOORMANFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Foley & Lardner | Apr 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Winston & Strawn | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| BERRY MOORMAN | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 1.94 | 0.00 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. FineRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.95× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- TODD B. PFISTERFoley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Michael S. BenHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. FineRopes & Gray | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 2.95 | 1.71 | 0.00 |
| TODD B. PFISTERFoley & Lardner | Apr 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Michael S. BenHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 17 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |