ENVIRONMENTAL POWER CORP EPG (last ticker on record)
CIK 805012Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Pierce AtwoodFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Pierce Atwood | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Ballard Spahr | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Patton Boggs | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- SCOTT E. PUESCHELHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
| SCOTT E. PUESCHELHALE AND DORR | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.24 |