Indian Hill Holdings Corp OIVO (last ticker on record)
CIK 804331Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jul 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2006 to Oct 2007
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gesmer UpdegroveFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- PEPE & HAZARDFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Heller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C.First linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gesmer Updegrove | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| PEPE & HAZARD | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.99 | 0.81 | 1.90 |
| Heller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C. | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.21 | 2.05 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Irving RothsteinHeller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C.First linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- RICHARD F. HOROWITZHeller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C.First linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irving RothsteinHeller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C. | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.92 | 2.18 | 1.37 |
| RICHARD F. HOROWITZHeller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C. | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 1.47 | 2.00 |